What Are the Key Differences Between CFC and Cowbell Crime Insurance?
Package Eligibility and Buyer Access
CFC includes crime in its US Management Liability package and declines California-domiciled businesses and U.S. public companies. Cowbell offers Zurich’s Select Plus crime module to private companies with fewer than 250 employees and less than $50 million in assets, but only through appointed wholesale brokers. Choose CFC if you meet its company eligibility and want crime in a management-liability package; choose Cowbell if your private company fits those size caps and can access an appointed wholesaler. [5] [8]
Paper, Access and Coverage Wording
Cowbell and Zurich both say Select Plus modules, including crime, are written on Zurich admitted paper. CFC’s regulatory page discloses FCA authorization and Lloyd’s Syndicate 1988 but does not name the issuer for a given US crime policy. The Cowbell crime module is accessed only by appointed Zurich E&S wholesalers through Cowbell’s API, not sold direct to businesses. CFC also sells crime inside a fintech package whose wording the reviewed pages do not equate with the management package. [8] [12] [6] [3]
What the Cover Descriptions Say
Cowbell describes crime as protecting against theft, fraud and embezzlement by employees or third parties. CFC’s brochure lists employee theft, funds-transfer fraud, credit-card and currency fraud, client crime, and on- or off-premises theft. Neither CFC’s brochure nor the Cowbell or Zurich Select Plus pages publish crime limits or retentions. [8] [5] [12]
What Should You Confirm in CFC and Cowbell Crime Insurance Quotes?
- Confirm you are a private company under Cowbell’s 250-employee and $50 million-asset band if the quote is Select Plus. [8]
- Ask CFC whether California domicile or public-company status is a decline, and whether crime is the management or fintech package. [5] [3]
- Ask which Zurich entity issues the Select Plus crime module; the pages name admitted paper without identifying the specific issuer. [12]
- Get crime limits and retentions from both quotes; neither reviewed set publishes them. [5] [8]
