What Are the Key Differences Between Coalition and Coverdash Crime Insurance?
Broker Access Versus Online Purchase
Coalition sells Executive Risks crime only through appointed brokers. Coverdash offers a digital quote-to-purchase process for businesses handling money, payroll or inventory, with options to add other coverages; its public crime page does not name an insurer or limit. Choose Coverdash if you want to buy crime online; choose Coalition if you are an eligible private or nonprofit organization and have access to an appointed broker. [3] [5]
Limits and Named Paper
Coalition says limits up to $10 million per coverage line may be available, and its disclaimer names Zurich American Insurance Company as the admitted carrier while also placing Executive Risks with unaffiliated non-admitted insurers. Coverdash’s commercial crime page does not publish specific limits and does not name the issuing insurer. [3] [4] [5]
Appetite and Cover Descriptions
Coalition says Executive Risks, including crime, is available to private and not-for-profit U.S. organizations in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., with up to $500 million in assets, up to 1,000 employees, and up to $500 million in plan assets. Coverdash markets commercial crime to any business that handles money, payroll or valuable inventory. Coalition describes crime as responding to theft, fraud and certain cybercrimes. Coverdash lists employee theft, forged checks and counterfeit currency, fraudulent funds-transfer instructions, and social-engineering losses, and lists commercial crime separately from cyber without stating how overlapping claims are coordinated. [3] [5] [6]
What Should You Confirm in Coalition and Coverdash Crime Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Coalition whether the placement is admitted Zurich paper or non-admitted, and whether the crime limit is the $10 million maximum. [4] [3]
- Get the issuing insurer and limits on the Coverdash placement. [5]
- Confirm you fit Coalition’s private or not-for-profit caps. [3]
- Ask Coverdash how a funds-transfer or social-engineering loss would be coordinated with a separate cyber policy. [6]
