What Are the Key Differences Between Coalition and Markel Insurance Crime Insurance?
Where Crime Sits in the Program
Coalition designs and distributes crime as one of four Executive Risks coverages through appointed brokers. Markel’s reviewed Cyber 360 page lists eCrime under fraud and unauthorized use and does not establish a standalone commercial crime policy. For buyers comparing a crime placement with cyber-related fraud protection, the program structure changes which quote and policy wording to request: Coalition’s crime coverage is part of Executive Risks, while Markel’s documented feature is within Cyber 360. [3] [5]
Eligible Organizations and Limits
Coalition states that Executive Risks crime is available to private and nonprofit U.S. organizations with up to $500 million in assets, 1,000 employees, and $500 million in plan assets; it says limits up to $10 million per coverage line may be available. Markel describes eCrime for Cyber 360 policyholders but leaves availability and terms to the quote. Coalition’s published thresholds give larger organizations a first eligibility screen; Markel buyers need confirmation that their cyber placement includes the component and its limit. [3] [5]
Fraud Scope and Placement
Coalition says its crime coverage responds to criminal activity including theft, fraud, and certain cybercrimes, subject to exclusions and limitations. Markel names unauthorized transfers and fake payment instructions as eCrime examples. Coalition requires an appointed broker for Executive Risks; Markel directs buyers to Markel or the named underwriting team for its broader Cyber 360 placement. Ask how the forms distinguish a covered crime loss from cyber response expense. [3] [5] [3] [5]
What Should You Confirm in Coalition and Markel Insurance Crime Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Coalition which carrier and placement route applies, then request the crime-specific limit and exclusions. [3]
- Ask Markel whether eCrime appears on the Cyber 360 quote and what limit applies to fake payment instructions and unauthorized transfers. [5]
- Compare each form’s treatment of cybercrime, theft, and fraud scenarios before assuming the policies respond to the same loss. [3]
