What Are the Key Differences Between Counterpart and Embroker Crime Insurance?
Which Loss Examples the Pages Spell Out
Embroker lists employee and third-party theft, forgery, digital fraud, money laundering, counterfeit currency, and social engineering. Counterpart names employee theft, forgery, computer or system fraud, funds transfer, and social engineering. The overlap is meaningful, but only Embroker’s reviewed page identifies third-party theft and money laundering specifically; ask whether those situations are covered by the final Counterpart form before relying on the broader examples. [4] [6]
Important Exclusions and Purchase Route
Embroker says its crime policy excludes income and indirect losses, coordinated crimes by executives or partners, third-party liability, and certain theft of digital information. Counterpart’s cited crime claims do not spell out comparable exclusions, which leaves a quote-level wording question rather than proof that those losses are covered. Counterpart routes buyers through wholesale brokers; Embroker discusses crime as standalone or an endorsement for some smaller businesses. [4] [3] [6]
