What Are the Key Differences Between Embroker and Foxquilt Crime Insurance?
Embroker describes standalone crime or an endorsement to a BOP or D&O policy and lists third-party theft, digital fraud and social engineering. Foxquilt markets crime standalone or as a BOP add-on and names employee dishonesty, fraud and forgery. Buyers can compare the placement structures and loss descriptions in the actual proposals. [3] [4]
Digital and third-party loss scenarios
Embroker names employee and third-party theft, digital fraud, money laundering, counterfeit currency and social engineering; Foxquilt names money-and-securities losses involving theft, employee dishonesty, fraud and forgery. Embroker also lists exclusions for certain indirect losses and executive or partner collusion. A company handling digital payments should compare these named scenarios with the definitions and exclusions in both forms. [3] [4]
Standalone and add-on structures
Embroker describes standalone coverage or an endorsement to BOP or D&O; Foxquilt describes standalone crime or a BOP add-on. A buyer should compare the crime limit and retention within each selected package rather than the separate premium alone. [3] [4]
