What Are the Key Differences Between Foxquilt and Marsh Crime Insurance?
Marsh lists employee and third-party fraud, collusion, hacking, social engineering and tangible-asset theft among risks a commercial crime policy can address. Its cited page is global and UK financial-professional-liability practice content; it cautions that coverage descriptions may not reflect a US-specific program. Foxquilt describes inside or outside theft involving money and securities, including employee dishonesty, fraud and forgery. [4] [3]
Loss scenarios
Both descriptions include employee-related dishonesty or fraud. Marsh also names third-party fraud, collusion, computer-related crime, social engineering and tangible-asset theft; Foxquilt’s page gives money-and-securities examples. Ask each placement team to map a specific vendor-payment or employee-funds scenario to policy wording. [4] [3]
Geographic and placement context
Marsh describes its practice as placing commercial crime and discusses complex placements up to $110 million; that is practice experience, not a limit available to a buyer, and the page’s global/UK scope may not reflect a US program. Foxquilt’s product page presents crime as standalone or a BOP add-on. Confirm jurisdiction, insurer, limits and any social-engineering terms in the proposal. [4] [3]
