What Are the Key Differences Between Marsh McLennan Agency and WTW Crime Insurance?
Coverage and Audience
WTW’s annual report lists crime insurance solutions in its Financial, Executive and Professional Risks practice. Marsh McLennan Agency names commercial crime and fidelity in its executive-risk offering. Neither brief description lists the policy’s insured events, so buyers should request the form and confirm employee theft, computer fraud and funds-transfer wording. [3] [8]
Terms and Buyer Support
WTW’s North American terms say an insurer quote is not confirmation of coverage; when the client orders binding, WTW seeks a formal commitment, usually a binder, then reviews policy documents against negotiated terms. Marsh McLennan Agency’s overview invites adviser contact but does not explain its bind or document review process. Ask Marsh McLennan Agency who checks the issued wording. [3] [8]
Placement and Claims Process
WTW’s intermediary terms apply to engagements governed by those terms, while Marsh McLennan Agency describes arranging crime placement. Both routes require clear service scope. Ask which agreement governs, who confirms binding, and who advocates if the issued crime wording differs from negotiated terms. [3] [8]
