What Are the Key Differences Between Marsh and Newfront Crime Insurance?
Marsh describes advisor-led crime placement and infill social-engineering cover; Newfront groups crime with fidelity but describes dashboard access and claims negotiation across Executive Risk. Request Newfront’s proposed crime form and Marsh’s limit for your program. [3] [5]
Marsh and MMA Versus Executive Risk
Marsh’s financial and professional liability practice places commercial crime, and Marsh McLennan Agency also places crime bundled with fidelity. You engage Marsh’s crime specialists directly; the reviewed pages describe advisor-led placement rather than an online quote. Newfront brokers crime as part of Executive Risk, listing fidelity and crime together as one Key Coverages entry, and you start by requesting a consultation. Neither side’s reviewed pages name the insurer. [3] [4] [5]
What Each Page Names as Covered
Marsh lists employee white-collar fraud, third-party fraud, collusion, hacking or computer-related crime, social-engineering fraud and tangible-asset theft, and notes that crime policies usually exclude ransomware. Newfront’s Executive Risk page lists Fidelity and Crime among Key Coverages and does not separately describe crime-specific insuring agreements such as employee theft, computer fraud or funds-transfer fraud. [3] [5]
Placement Help and Program Access
Marsh says it provides insights on emerging crime risks, claim examples, market conditions and product education throughout renewal and placement. Newfront says clients get 24/7 dashboard access to policies, certificates and billing, that renewals use pre-populated historical data, and that it provides integrated claims and coverage negotiation for Executive Risk lines. [3] [5]