What Are the Key Differences Between Marsh and Zurich U.S. Crime Insurance?
Social-engineering layers and direct-loss triggers
Marsh says it can arrange infill and top-up social-engineering cover above an existing program, while Zurich describes computer and funds-transfer fraud through direct loss tied to specified transfer mechanisms. For a buyer whose current crime limit is inadequate, Marsh’s excess placement may address a different need than replacing or packaging a Zurich policy. Ask how the layers attach and whether impersonation is covered. [3] [8]
Placement advice and risk assessment
Marsh describes ongoing insights on emerging crime risks, claims examples, market conditions and product education during placement and renewal. Zurich’s crime-risk service identifies vulnerabilities and provides specialist recommendations. One supports market and program decisions; the other focuses on organizational crime resilience. Ask Marsh for its carrier comparison and Zurich for the assessment scope and written recommendations. [3] [8]
Limits and policy form
Marsh cites experience with placements around $10 million to $110 million but publishes no standard limit for a particular account. Zurich describes its crime offering and policy forms but its reviewed record does not provide a limit figure. Treat any size range as placement experience, not a quote: request proposed limits, retentions, exclusions and the actual issuing insurer from both. [3] [8]
