What Are the Key Differences Between AIG and Marsh Fidelity Bonds?
Standalone Bond Family or Crime Placement
AIG markets Financial Institution Bonds as a distinct product for banks, lenders, asset managers, and insurers. Marsh says it places fidelity with commercial crime rather than offering a separate fidelity product, and its pages also group commercial crime and fidelity together for middle-market clients. Financial institutions should ask Marsh whether it can place a dedicated FI bond form; buyers approaching AIG can request the application aligned to their institution type. [1] [2]
Employee Fraud and Issuing Carrier
Marsh describes employee white-collar fraud as trusted staff exploiting systems for personal gain, while AIG lists employee dishonesty, theft, forgery, and computer systems fraud in its FI bond examples. Marsh does not name the insurer for a buyer’s placement; AIG also asks the buyer to confirm the issuing entity. Compare the insuring agreements and loss triggers in the actual form, particularly if employee conduct overlaps with broader commercial crime coverage. [2] [1]
