What Are the Key Differences Between Marsh and TechInsurance Fidelity Bonds?
Named Bond Forms Online Versus a Crime Program
Marsh’s reviewed pages do not list a standalone fidelity bond; they treat employee white-collar fraud as a commercial-crime risk, and MMA groups commercial crime/fidelity as one practice item. TechInsurance details first-party and third-party forms, plus employee-dishonesty, business-service, janitorial and ERISA variants, and uses a short online application. For ERISA, TechInsurance says the bond must come from a Treasury-authorized surety. Choose TechInsurance if you want to compare named bond forms online; choose Marsh if you want fidelity considered inside a broader commercial-crime program. [1] [2] [4]
Who Each Firm Says the Cover Is For
Marsh’s reviewed pages do not publish fidelity-specific eligibility. TechInsurance aims the product at businesses whose employees handle sensitive financial information or unsupervised client property, naming examples such as web hosting, project management, cleaning, healthcare and security-guard companies. Marsh’s crime page speaks to employee fraud against the business; TechInsurance also sells third-party bonds meant to protect clients. [1] [4]
Specialist Intake Versus Online Quote and Cost Drivers
You engage a Marsh or MMA crime and fidelity specialist, because the cover sits with commercial crime rather than a separate application path. TechInsurance takes a short online application and says licensed agents can add fidelity bonds to a broader package. Marsh does not name an insurer or publish limits. TechInsurance does not name a surety for a standard bond, and says cost typically follows the total bond amount, then type, industry risk, employee access and credit score. [1] [2] [4]
What Should You Confirm in Marsh and TechInsurance Fidelity Bonds Quotes?
- Ask Marsh whether you are buying a crime policy, a surety-style fidelity bond, or both. [1] [2]
- Ask TechInsurance which variant is on the quote and, for ERISA, which Treasury-listed surety issues it. [4]
- Confirm first-party versus third-party intent if clients’ property is in play. [4] [1]
- Compare retentions and whether the bonding company can seek repayment from the dishonest employee, which TechInsurance notes as a surety feature. [4]
